Sample data

September 26, 2026

•
Sample data

{{minute}}

min Read

11 Best Directive Consulting Alternatives for B2B SaaS in 2026

Waqas Kokhar

Founder at ScalixAI

On this page

What Is Centralized Notification Infrastructure?

The Default State: The Big Notification Mess

Building Workflows Without Engineering Dependency

Easy Debugging with Logs 

Embedded & Branded In-App Inbox

Multi-Tenant Aware Preference Center

Not Sure Which Directive Alternative Fits Your Stage?

Book a Free Audit

Key takeaways

1.

ScalixAI offers flat-fee pricing starting at $6,000/mo, with no percentage of ad spend, no setup fee, and a 3-month minimum term. Full Funnel (Google + LinkedIn) is $12,000/mo.

2.

Only about 5% of a B2B SaaS market is actively searching at any given moment. Google captures the 5%. LinkedIn creates demand in the 95% that isn't buying yet (LinkedIn B2B Institute, 95-5 rule, Prof. John Dawes).

3.

Wispr Flow closed 25 deals with an 868% revenue ROI in 90 days on the ScalixAI-managed LinkedIn Ads program. See the Wispr Flow case study.

4.

Arini booked 90+ demos and signed 17 new clients in 3 months, growing monthly demo volume from 20 to 34. See the Arini case study.

5.

A typical B2B buying committee involves 6 to 10 decision-makers (Gartner B2B buying journey research). That's the audience LinkedIn Ads reaches by title, seniority, and company. Google alone can't.

The best Directive Consulting alternatives for B2B SaaS in 2026 are ScalixAI, Hey Digital, KlientBoost, TripleDart, Powered by Search, Kalungi, Bay Leaf Digital, Refine Labs, NoGood, Understory Agency, and Single Grain. ScalixAI ranks first because an ex-Google Senior Growth Manager with 9 years inside Google runs Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads as one system, on a published flat fee starting at $6,000 per month, with a 3-month minimum and no percentage of spend.

Directive Consulting is a credible enterprise agency, but that doesn’t necessarily make it the right fit for every SaaS company. Seed-to-Series B teams typically don’t leave because of quality. They leave because the agency model no longer fits what they need: enterprise-shaped teams, unpublished pricing, broad coverage instead of deep expertise in one channel, or less founder-level attention on smaller accounts.

With that in mind, this article looks at 11 alternatives for Seed-to-Series B B2B SaaS companies generating $500K to $20M in ARR, with ACVs between $5,000 and $50,000. Each alternative is evaluated using sourced information, including the date of the claim and, where available, a named client and specific results.

What is Directive Consulting, and why do B2B SaaS teams look for alternatives?

Directive Consulting is a full-service B2B tech agency founded in 2013 that positions its method as "Customer Generation." The firm self-reports 100+ marketing strategists, 420+ brands served, and six global offices across Orange County, Austin, NYC, Mexico City, London, and Toronto, with clients including Amazon, Adobe, Cisco, and Gong. Services span paid media, SEO and content, CRO, and RevOps under one methodology.

Most B2B SaaS teams look for Directive Consulting alternatives for fit reasons, not quality reasons. Four gaps drive the search.

Built for enterprise scale

A 100-plus-strategist bench works when the account has the budget and complexity to justify it. Series A and Series B B2B SaaS companies with $500K to $20M ARR usually don't. Below Series C, most teams want a focused pod, not a slice of a large team, and Directive's structure was built for the other buyer.

Pricing is not published

Directive doesn't publish pricing on its site. Third-party benchmarks place retainers around $5,000 to $10,000+ per month, with a startup package reported near $6,500 per month. For Seed to Series B founders comparing agencies against a fixed budget, no public pricing means every proposal is a discovery call before you know if the math even closes.

Many channels, one methodology

The "Customer Generation" approach spans paid, SEO, content, CRO, and RevOps. That breadth is a strength at scale. At smaller scale, it means depth per channel varies. B2B SaaS pipeline at Seed and Series A usually comes from one or two channels done deeply, not five channels done broadly.

Early-stage teams want founder-level attention

Directive is built for scale, which can mean the senior strategist you meet on the pitch isn't the person managing your account day to day. For a Series A founder who has to explain paid spend to the board, that can be frustrating. Smaller specialists work differently. You may get a smaller team, but the person you hire is often the person actually doing the work.

Best Directive alternatives at a glance: B2B SaaS marketing agencies compared

Every alternative below is ranked for Seed to Series B B2B SaaS companies. Pricing and contract details come from agency websites checked in September 2026. Where a number comes directly from an agency’s own claims, we’ve clearly labeled it as self-reported.

The 11 best B2B SaaS marketing agencies compared

[table]
Agency | Best for | Channels | Pricing | Minimum term | Proof
ScalixAI | Seed to Series B B2B SaaS running Google + LinkedIn as one system | Google, LinkedIn | Published flat fee from $6,000/mo | 3-month, then month-to-month | Wispr Flow: 25 closed-won deals, 868% revenue ROI in 90 days
Directive Consulting | Enterprise and upper mid-market B2B tech | Google, LinkedIn, Meta, SEO | Not published (verify on sales call) | Not published | 420+ brands served (self-reported per directiveconsulting.com, September 2026)
Hey Digital | B2B SaaS teams wanting a paid-only specialist | Google, LinkedIn, Meta, YouTube, Reddit, Bing | Not published | Not published | 200+ B2B SaaS clients, $2.3M+ monthly ad spend (self-reported per heydigital.co, September 2026)
KlientBoost | Teams wanting paid ads + CRO landing page testing | Google, Microsoft, Meta, LinkedIn | Not published; third-party listings report entry from ~$1,000 to $4,000/mo (self-reported) | Not published | Publishes a quarterly client goal-hit rate (self-reported)
TripleDart | SaaS teams wanting SEO, paid, and RevOps under one roof | Google, LinkedIn, Meta, SEO | Not published | Not published | 300+ clients across 12 countries; Glean, VWO (self-reported per tripledart.com, September 2026)
Powered by Search | B2B SaaS wanting a search-led, integrated paid, SEO, and content program | Google, LinkedIn, SEO | Not published | Not published | 200+ B2B companies; SentinelOne, Basecamp (self-reported per poweredbysearch.com, September 2026)
Kalungi | B2B SaaS needing a fractional CMO plus execution | Google, LinkedIn, SEO | Tiered by ARR band (partly published) | Engagement-based | 150+ SaaS companies; T2D3 methodology by Stijn Hendrikse (self-reported per kalungi.com, September 2026)
Bay Leaf Digital | Post-PMF SaaS ($2M+ ARR) wanting strategy-led full-funnel marketing | Google, SEO | Authority Builder $3,999/mo; Growth Partner from $5,000/mo | 6-month engagement on entry tier | SaaS-only since 2013; IRS Solutions, TEXT2DRIVE (self-reported per bayleafdigital.com, September 2026)
Refine Labs | Later-stage B2B tech ($50M+ ARR) rebuilding demand creation | LinkedIn, Google, YouTube, Meta, CTV | Paid media management from $14,000/mo; full service from $26,000/mo | 6-month minimum | 300+ B2B tech companies; Clari, Firstup (self-reported per refinelabs.com, September 2026)
NoGood | Brands wanting a growth squad across paid, organic, and CRO | Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, SEO | Average retainer above $20,000/mo (partly published) | Not published | Nike, TikTok, MongoDB (self-reported per nogood.io, September 2026)
Understory Agency | Post-PMF B2B SaaS wanting paid, outbound, and RevOps as one motion | LinkedIn, Google, Meta, Reddit, X, email | Custom flat retainers per service, not published | 6-month minimum (4 months for earlier-stage) | 100+ B2B SaaS clients; Clay, Expensify, Nylas (self-reported per understoryagency.com, September 2026)
Single Grain | Companies wanting one broad revenue marketing partner | Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, SEO | Not published; engagements reported starting $10,000+/mo | Not published | 500+ companies; Nextiva (self-reported per singlegrain.com, September 2026)
[/table]

How we ranked the best B2B SaaS marketing agencies

We looked at six criteria for every agency on this list. The ranking puts more weight on B2B SaaS experience, clear pricing, and shorter contract commitments, since those tend to matter most to Seed to Series B founders.

The six criteria:

  1. SaaS focus. Is B2B SaaS the entire business or one of several verticals?
  2. Channel depth. How deep is expertise in the one or two channels that drive B2B SaaS pipeline (Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads)?
  3. Pricing transparency. Is pricing published on the site or hidden behind a discovery call?
  4. Contract flexibility. Is the minimum term 3 months or 12?
  5. Who runs the account? Is the person who sold you the account the same person executing it?
  6. Pipeline reporting. Does reporting default to demos, SQLs, CAC, and closed revenue, or to impressions, clicks, and CTR?

Disclosure: ScalixAI publishes this list. We ranked ourselves first and explained why. Judge the criteria yourself. Every claim in this article can be verified against a public source in the month it was written.

1. ScalixAI: best B2B paid media agency for Seed to Series B SaaS

ScalixAI is a Directive Consulting alternative for Seed-to-Series B B2B SaaS companies that want more predictable demo volume by running Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads as one connected system, from creating demand to capturing it. Founder Waqas Khokhar spent 9 years inside Google as a Senior Growth Manager, managing over $1B in ad spend on the platform side. Pricing is mentioned on the website. They charge a flat fee that starts at $6,000 per month with a 3-month minimum, then month-to-month.

Best for: Seed to Series B B2B SaaS companies doing $500K to $20M ARR, with a $5,000 to $50,000 ACV, at least one AE closing deals, and a clearly defined ICP. The ideal buyer is dealing with an unpredictable pipeline and wants an ex-Google operator actively involved in the account

Services and channels: Google Ads (Search, Performance Max, YouTube, Demand Gen, Display) and LinkedIn Ads (Lead Gen, Retargeting, Thought Leadership Ads). CRO recommendations, offline conversion tracking wired to HubSpot or Salesforce, and cross-channel attribution via Fibbler. See the Google Ads service and LinkedIn Ads service pages for scope.

Pricing: Google Search starts at $6,000 per month, while the Google Full Stack is $10,000 per month and is the most popular option. LinkedIn Demand is $6,000 per month, and the Full Funnel package covering both Google and LinkedIn is $12,000 per month. Thought Leadership Ads are available as an add-on for $1,000 per month. There is no percentage of ad spend or setup fee. Clients also keep ownership of their ad accounts.

Minimum term: 3 months, then month-to-month. No annual lock-in.

Proof (all published on scalixai.com in September 2026):

[table]
Client | Channel | Timeframe | Result
Wispr Flow | LinkedIn Ads | 90 days | 25 closed-won deals, 868% revenue ROI, $856K influenced revenue
Delve | Google Ads | 6 months | $1.2M closed-won revenue; supported a $32M Series A
Oneleet | Google Ads | 3 months | 301 conversions; $1M+ closed-won; company raised a $33M Series A
Arini | Google Ads | Jan to Mar 2026 | 90+ booked demos, 17 signed clients, 29 in pipeline; monthly demos grew from 20 to 34
Guru | Google Ads | 65 days | Demos nearly tripled month over month; cost per demo cut by more than half
FYXER AI | Google Ads | Ongoing | 20x revenue scaled; 10,000+ customers; 12% of ARR from Google Ads
[/table]

What clients say: Waqas leads strategy and reporting himself. Every account gets a weekly Slack report on demos, SQLs, CAC, and closed revenue, plus a monthly business review (MBR) and quarterly business review (QBR). Full Funnel clients get a 4-hour Slack SLA.

Strengths:

  • Ex-Google platform knowledge. Nine years inside Google, $1B+ managed. No agency-side certifications. Actual auction-side pattern recognition.
  • Published pricing. Flat fee. No percentage of ad spend. The agency earns the same whether your budget is $10K or $100K per month, which removes the incentive to grow spend for its own sake.
  • Google + LinkedIn as one system. Fibbler attribution shows how LinkedIn engagement influences Google conversions. Most agencies run the two channels in isolation. This is where the pipeline compounding actually comes from.
  • Capacity cap. Only 3 new clients per month. The people who sell are the people who run the account. No junior handoffs.
  • Named client results with timeframes and links. Every proof point above ties to a public case study page.

Considerations (honest):

  • Paid media only. ScalixAI runs Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads. Teams that need SEO retainers, cold outbound, or Meta-first programs should pair Scalix with a specialist, or choose a full-service agency.
  • 3-month minimum. Data needs 60 to 90 days to mature because B2B sales cycles run 45 to 90 days. Faster timelines produce misleading reads.
  • Not for pre-revenue, PLG-only teams, e-commerce, D2C, or ACV under $3,000. The paid media math doesn't close below those thresholds.
  • Requires a working landing page and an ad budget separate from the retainer. The management fee is separate from spend paid directly to Google and LinkedIn.

Pick ScalixAI if: You are a Seed or Series A founder-CEO or a Series A/B Head of Growth who has already burned budget somewhere and needs a diagnosis before the next dollar goes in. You want the person who sold you the engagement to be the person running it, published pricing you can defend to your CFO, and reporting that ties every campaign back to closed revenue.

2. Hey Digital

Hey Digital is a paid-only B2B SaaS specialist that pairs media buying with in-house creative and landing page production. If your main problem is creative velocity rather than channel breadth, Hey Digital is one of the cleanest specialist options in the market.

Best for: B2B SaaS teams that want an in-house, paid-only specialist with SaaS-specific creative and landing pages.

Services and channels: PPC, paid social, demand generation, video ads, ABM, and landing page design across Google, LinkedIn, Meta, YouTube, Reddit, and Bing.

Pricing: Not published (verify on sales call).

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: 200+ B2B SaaS clients and $2.3M+ in monthly ad spend managed; named clients include PostHog and Toggl.

Strengths: SaaS-exclusive focus at boutique scale. In-house creative and landing page production removes a common bottleneck. Coverage across six paid channels, including Reddit, which most specialists skip.

Considerations: Pricing and contract terms not public. Breadth across six platforms means channel depth varies by which pod you're assigned to. No SEO or outbound service, so teams needing those channels will need a second vendor.

3. KlientBoost

KlientBoost is a paid media and CRO shop with a published accountability system. Its differentiator is testing velocity: quarterly goal-hit rates, KPI pacing dashboards, and free additional resources when the pacing slips.

Best for: Teams whose bottleneck is paid ads plus landing page CRO testing, and who want accountability mechanics baked into the retainer.

Services and channels: PPC (Google, Microsoft, Meta, LinkedIn), CRO, landing pages, email.

Pricing: Not published on site. Third-party listings report entry points from about $1,000 to $4,000/mo (verify on sales call).

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: Publishes a quarterly client goal-hit rate; multi-industry client roster.

Strengths: Published accountability mechanics you can audit quarterly. Deep CRO and landing page craft attached to the paid work. Testing velocity across a large book of accounts.

Considerations: Not B2B SaaS-exclusive. Serves e-commerce, education, and other verticals with the same team, so playbooks aren't SaaS-specific by default. No SEO or outbound service.

4. TripleDart

TripleDart is an AI-native B2B marketing agency that runs SEO, paid media, and RevOps under one roof with globally distributed delivery. Positioned as "The Complete GTM Engine," it's one of the more integrated options at mid-market scale.

Best for: SaaS teams that want SEO, paid media, and RevOps-style operations under one roof at a lower cost point than enterprise agencies, with delivery across US and India time zones.

Services and channels: SEO and content, paid media, ABM, CRO, RevOps, and HubSpot.

Pricing: Not published.

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: 300+ clients across 12 countries; 80+ people; named clients include Glean and VWO.

Strengths: Genuine breadth across organic, paid, and RevOps under one roof. Heavy investment in AI-assisted workflows and a proprietary platform.

Considerations: Client range spans startup to enterprise, so ask for Series A through B references specifically. No cold outbound service.

If your paid budget is producing demos your AEs can't close, that is a targeting problem, not a channel problem. Book a free audit, and we'll show you where the spend leaks.

Get a Free Audit

5. Powered by Search

Powered by Search is one of the closest alternatives to Directive Consulting on this list. It takes a similar approach, combining search with broader B2B demand generation, but operates with a much smaller team. It also publicly guarantees 30% more opportunities within 90 days.

Best for: B2B SaaS teams that want a search-led integrated program covering paid, SEO, content, and ABM under one roof, without an enterprise-shaped bench.

Services and channels: SEO, PPC, demand generation, ABM, digital PR and link building, HubSpot MoPS and RevOps, GEO (AI search visibility).

Pricing: Not published (verify on sales call).

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: 200+ B2B companies; named clients include SentinelOne, Varonis, Basecamp.

Strengths: More than a decade of B2B software track record. Breadth across search, paid, ABM, and RevOps that resembles Directive's integrated ambition at a smaller scale. Public performance guarantee.

Considerations: The engine is search-led, not paid-led. Cold outbound is not the offer. Team concentrated in North America. The guarantee has qualifying conditions worth reading closely on a call.

6. Kalungi

Kalungi answers a different question than Directive: not "who runs my channels better," but "who runs my marketing function, period." The firm sells GTM-as-a-service for B2B SaaS, pairing a fractional CMO with a full execution team across every channel, stage-matched by ARR band.

Best for: B2B SaaS companies without a senior marketing leader who need a fractional CMO plus a full execution team, not just channel execution.

Services and channels: Fractional CMO leadership, ABM, paid media, content and SEO, RevOps and HubSpot, branding, web.

Pricing: Kalungi uses different engagement models depending on the company’s stage. Its Full-Service model is for companies doing $5M to $10M in ARR and is positioned as a replacement for 10 or more hires. Syntropy is designed for companies in the $1M to $5M ARR range, while its T2D3 playbooks are tailored for earlier-stage companies. Pay-per-performance is also available for some full-service engagements. Check out some of these pricing on their website.

Minimum term: Engagement-based.

Proof: 150+ SaaS companies served; methodology published in the book T2D3 by Stijn Hendrikse.

Strengths: Genuine full-function coverage, including the strategy layer. Published, inspectable methodology. Stage-matched engagement models. SaaS-only focus.

Considerations: Department-replacement model is heavier than a channel engagement. Teams with a strong in-house VP Marketing may only need a channel specialist. Signal-based cold outbound is not the spine of the offer.

7. Bay Leaf Digital

Bay Leaf Digital was founded in 2013 (the same year as Directive Consulting) and spent the years since going narrow where Directive went wide: SaaS-only, boutique scale, strategy-first process. It's the only agency on this list that pairs published pricing with a SaaS-exclusive focus.

Best for: Post-PMF SaaS ($2M+ ARR) that wants strategy-led, full-funnel marketing from a SaaS-only boutique.

Services and channels: GTM strategy, SEO, GEO, content, PPC, retargeting, analytics, HubSpot.

Pricing: Published on site. Authority Builder is available for $3,999/mo on a 6-month engagement. Growth Partner from $5,000/mo.

Minimum term: 6-month engagement on the entry tier.

Proof: SaaS-only since 2013; named clients include IRS Solutions, TEXT2DRIVE, and MeazureUp.

Strengths: SaaS-only depth held for over a decade. Published pricing at the entry tier. Strategy-first process rather than channel execution on day one. Analytics and RevOps in scope.

Considerations: SEO-weighted service mix. Boutique capacity means finite team availability. No LinkedIn Ads vertical; the paid side is Google-centric.

8. Refine Labs

Refine Labs is here because many teams searching for Directive Consulting alternatives find it first, and for the mid-market buyer it's a mismatch. Founded by Chris Walker, the firm is built on demand creation and explicitly targets B2B tech at Series B and beyond with $50M+ ARR.

Best for: Later-stage B2B tech ($50M+ ARR) rebuilding demand creation away from MQL-based reporting.

Services and channels: Demand strategy, paid media across LinkedIn, Google, YouTube, Meta, CTV. Creative and advisory work.

Pricing: Published on site. Paid media management starts at $14,000/mo, full service at $26,000/mo, and Revenue Performance Assessment at $35,000.

Minimum term: 6-month minimum.

Proof: 300+ B2B tech companies since 2019; named clients include Clari, Firstup, dotCMS, Bonterra.

Strengths: Published rate card, which almost nobody in this category offers. Strategy and execution are held by the same people. Genuine track record on demand creation methodology.

Considerations: The firm itself targets $50M+ ARR, so most Series A to Series B companies are explicitly not the ICP. Pricing sits well above most Seed-to-Series B budgets. No cold outbound.

9. NoGood

NoGood runs the growth-squad model: cross-functional teams of strategists, creators, growth engineers, and data scientists deployed against your funnel, with brand-name proof across both consumer and B2B tech.

Best for: Brands wanting a growth squad across paid, organic, and CRO with big-name proof, and a budget to match.

Services and channels: Paid search and social, SEO, content, performance branding, CRO, analytics, AI search platform work.

Pricing: Average retainer above $20,000/mo (partly published per nogood.io, September 2026).

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: Client logos include Nike, TikTok, MongoDB, Intuit, P&G, ByteDance, Oura; 84% self-reported client retention rate.

Strengths: Brand-name proof across consumer and B2B tech. Multi-disciplinary squad, not a single-channel team. Published pricing expectations save discovery calls. Strong content and organic craft alongside paid.

Considerations: One consideration is that the agency works with both consumer and enterprise companies, so B2B SaaS is only one part of its focus. Its published average retainer is also higher than what many Seed and Series A companies can afford. It does not offer outbound services.

10. Understory Agency

Understory Agency is the only firm on this list that runs signal-based outbound as a core service alongside paid media. If your problem is that your paid vendor and your outbound vendor never talk, Understory is built for that specific gap.

Best for: Post-PMF B2B SaaS wanting paid media, Clay-based outbound, LinkedIn content, and HubSpot RevOps bundled as one "allbound" motion.

Services and channels: Paid media (LinkedIn, Google, Meta, Reddit, X, plus G2 and TrustRadius placements), GTM engineering (cold and signal-based outbound engineered in Clay), LinkedIn content, creative and landing pages, HubSpot-native RevOps.

Pricing: Custom flat retainers per service, not published on site.

Minimum term: 6-month minimum (4 months for earlier-stage companies).

Proof: No. 140 on the 2026 Inc. 5000 with 2,231% three-year growth; Enterprise Clay Partner and one of the first five certified Clay Experts; named clients include Clay, Expensify, Nylas, RB2B, Retention.com.

Strengths: The only agency on this list built around allbound (paid, outbound, content, and RevOps as one motion). Deep Clay depth on the outbound side. Founder-run accounts. Flat-retainer incentives.

Considerations: Bundled model is heavier than a channel engagement. 6-month minimum is longer than most specialists. Cold outbound may not suit brand or compliance-sensitive teams. Founded on Series A+ post-PMF buyers, so pre-PMF or sub-$1M ARR teams are a poor fit.

11. Single Grain

Single Grain is the operator-led entry on this list. CEO Eric Siu, who bought the agency in 2014, hosts the Leveling Up and Marketing School podcasts, and the agency sells a broad service range positioned as "revenue marketing."

Best for: Companies across many industries that want one broad "revenue marketing" partner for SEO, AEO, paid, and content.

Services and channels: SEO, AEO/GEO, paid media (Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube), creative, content, CRO, AI implementation.

Pricing: Not published; engagements have been reported starting around $10,000+/mo.

Minimum term: Not published.

Proof: 500+ companies served; $1B+ revenue influenced; 3.2x average client ROI; named clients include Nextiva and Lever.

Strengths: Service breadth across search, paid, and content from one partner. Founder with a public media presence. Genuine SaaS case history alongside other verticals.

Considerations: Multi-industry generalist. B2B SaaS is one lane among many. No outbound service. Headline metrics are self-reported.

How much does Directive Consulting cost compared to its alternatives?

Directive Consulting does not publish pricing. Third-party benchmarks place its retainers around $5,000 to $10,000+ per month, with a startup package reported near $6,500 per month. By comparison, ScalixAI publishes flat fees from $6,000 per month for Google Search or LinkedIn Demand and $12,000 per month for both combined, with no percentage of ad spend.

Of the 11 alternatives here, only four publish pricing: ScalixAI, Bay Leaf Digital, Refine Labs, and NoGood (partly). Seven require a sales call to know the number.

Pricing and contract comparison

[table]
Agency | Pricing model | Published entry price | Minimum term | Percentage of ad spend?
ScalixAI | Flat fee: Google Search $6,000/mo, Google Full Stack $10,000/mo, LinkedIn Demand $6,000/mo, Full Funnel $12,000/mo | Yes | 3-month minimum, then month-to-month | No, flat fee
Directive Consulting | Not published. Third-party benchmarks $5,000 to $10,000+/mo; startup package reported near $6,500/mo | No | Not published | Verify
Hey Digital | Not published | No | Not published | Verify
KlientBoost | Not published on site; third-party listings ~$1,000 to $4,000/mo | No | Not published | Verify
TripleDart | Not published | No | Not published | Verify
Powered by Search | Not published | No | Not published | Verify
Kalungi | Tiered by ARR band | Partly | Engagement-based | Verify
Bay Leaf Digital | Authority Builder $3,999/mo; Growth Partner from $5,000/mo | Yes | 6-month engagement on entry tier | Verify
Refine Labs | Paid media management from $14,000/mo; full service from $26,000/mo | Yes | 6-month minimum | Verify
NoGood | Average retainer above $20,000/mo | Partly | Not published | Verify
Understory Agency | Custom flat retainers per service | No | 6-month minimum | No, flat retainers
Single Grain | Not published; reported starting ~$10,000+/mo | No | Not published | Verify
[/table]

Is Directive Consulting a good agency? What reviews and client proof show

Yes, Directive Consulting is a credible agency for enterprise and upper mid-market B2B tech. It self-reports 100+ marketing strategists and 420+ brands served across paid media, SEO, CRO, and RevOps. The Clutch profile shows strong reviews across dozens of B2B tech engagements. For a Series C+ SaaS company looking for a single full-service partner with the bench to handle everything, Directive is a legitimate choice.

Seed-to-Series B SaaS teams choose specialists over Directive not because Directive is weak, but because the fit doesn't match. Below Series C, most teams don't need every channel under one methodology. They need one or two channels done at the level a specialist can offer, with published pricing, shorter contracts, and the most senior operator on their account week to week. That's a different agency, not a better one.

Directive Consulting vs ScalixAI: what is the difference?

Directive Consulting takes a broad, full-service approach, covering paid media, SEO, CRO, and RevOps with a large team. ScalixAI takes a much narrower approach, focusing exclusively on Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads for B2B SaaS. The company is led by an ex-Google Senior Growth Manager and uses published flat fees with a 3-month minimum.

Both operate in B2B tech marketing, but the way they work is different. Directive is built for companies looking for a wider range of services, while ScalixAI is built around paid acquisition and hands-on channel expertise.

Directive Consulting vs ScalixAI

[table]
Dimension | Directive Consulting | ScalixAI
Built for | Enterprise and upper mid-market B2B tech | Seed to Series B B2B SaaS ($500K to $20M ARR)
Team model | Large bench, 100+ strategists (self-reported) | Founder-led. No juniors. 3 new clients per month cap.
Channels | Paid, SEO, content, CRO, RevOps | Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads only
Method | Customer Generation | Demand creation (LinkedIn) to demand capture (Google)
Pricing visibility | Not published | Published
Entry price | Reported around $5,000 to $10,000+/mo | $6,000/mo flat (Google Search or LinkedIn Demand)
Fee model | Verify | Flat fee. No percentage of spend. No setup fee.
Minimum term | Verify | 3 months, then month-to-month
Reporting | Full-funnel reporting | Weekly Slack report on demos, SQLs, CAC, closed revenue; MBR and QBR
Pick it if | You want one enterprise partner for every channel | You need predictable demo volume from paid and want the ex-Google operator on the account
[/table]

Capability comparison

The matrix below is what a founder-CEO or Head of Growth actually cares about across the 11 alternatives.

[table]
Agency | B2B SaaS only | Google + LinkedIn as one system | Pricing published | No % of spend | Min term 3 mo or less | Senior runs account | SEO | Outbound
ScalixAI | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘
Directive Consulting | ~ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
Hey Digital | ✔ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ✘ | ✘
KlientBoost | ✘ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ~ | ✘
TripleDart | ✔ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
Powered by Search | ~ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
Kalungi | ✔ | ~ | ~ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
Bay Leaf Digital | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ? | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘
Refine Labs | ~ | ~ | ✔ | ? | ✘ | ~ | ✘ | ✘
NoGood | ✘ | ~ | ~ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
Understory Agency | ~ | ~ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | ✔
Single Grain | ✘ | ~ | ✘ | ? | ? | ~ | ✔ | ✘
[/table]

Which Directive alternative fits your stage? Choosing a B2B demand generation agency

The right agency depends on stage, budget, and which channels are your bottleneck. This decision table matches the most common scenarios to the best fit.

Which alternative fits your situation

[table]
If you are... | Pick | Why
Seed founder-CEO launching the first serious paid program | ScalixAI | Published $6,000 entry, founder runs it, 3-month minimum
Series A Head of Growth who burned budget on LinkedIn before | ScalixAI | Diagnosis first, Fibbler attribution, weekly pipeline reporting
Series B+ team wanting SEO, paid, and RevOps from one vendor | Powered by Search or Directive Consulting | Integrated search-led programs at scale
Team that wants paid plus cold outbound in one retainer | Understory Agency | Bundled paid, Clay outbound, and RevOps
Company without a marketing leader | Kalungi | Fractional CMO plus execution team
$50M+ ARR brand rebuilding demand creation | Refine Labs | Published $14,000+/mo, built for later stage
Budget-sensitive team wanting SEO and paid together | TripleDart or Bay Leaf Digital | Lower entry cost, SEO-weighted
Team with heavy landing page testing needs | KlientBoost | Paid plus CRO testing depth
[/table]

For the founder-CEO: The Seed-to-Series A founder buying paid media for the first time is buying against a specific fear, which is spending $30K to $90K over three months and having nothing to show the board. The right agency for that fear is one that publishes pricing before the sales call, defines what success looks like in month one before campaigns launch, and gives you the senior operator on your account weekly. That's why ScalixAI leads for this buyer.

For the Head of Growth: The Series A or Series B Head of Growth already has a paid program. What they're buying is leverage. A specialist who can take an existing account, diagnose what's broken, and rebuild it against pipeline instead of clicks. This buyer wants pipeline attribution wired into the CRM, weekly reporting on demos and SQLs, and permission to blame the tool (attribution, tracking, or channel mix) rather than the person. ScalixAI is built for this buyer too, with Fibbler cross-channel attribution and weekly Slack reports tied to closed revenue.

What should you look for in a B2B PPC agency?

Five specific criteria matter more than any brand recognition, case study prestige, or industry award. Each is a question to ask on the sales call.

1. Who actually runs my account?

At most agencies, the senior strategist on the pitch call is not the person executing daily. Ask directly: "Is [name of person on this call] the person running my account, or is this being handed off?" A specialist should answer with a named person, a resume, and a commitment. If the answer is "our team," ask again.

2. Do you publish pricing, and do you charge a percentage of ad spend?

Published pricing removes a discovery call and lets you compare proposals against a fixed budget. Percentage-of-spend pricing means the agency's revenue grows when your budget grows, whether or not pipeline follows. Both signals matter more than the number on the invoice. Ask: "Can you send me a pricing sheet before we do another call?"

3. How do you report pipeline, not clicks?

Weekly reports should lead with qualified demos, SQL rate, cost per qualified demo, and CAC trajectory. Impressions, CTR, and quality score can appear as supporting detail but should never lead. Ask: "Can you send a sample weekly report before we sign?" If the first metric on the page is impressions, the report was built for the agency, not for your board.

4. What is the minimum term?

Three to six months is fair. Twelve months without an exit clause is commercial protection for the agency, not a performance requirement. B2B sales cycles run 45 to 90 days, so 90 days is the minimum window in which any agency can produce a real read. Ask: "What are the contract terms, and what happens if we need to pause?"

5. Can you show a named client result with a timeframe?

Percentages without absolute numbers can mean anything. "Increased demos 300%" can be two to eight demos. "90 booked demos and 17 signed clients in 3 months for [named client]" cannot. Ask: "Show me a case study that reports pipeline generated, not leads or traffic. Named client, absolute numbers, dated timeframe."

Agencies that answer all five in writing are safer bets. Agencies that hedge on any of the five are hedging on execution too.

Final verdict: which Directive alternative is best for B2B SaaS in 2026?

For Seed to Series B B2B SaaS, the right Directive alternative depends on how much breadth, specialization, and hands-on involvement you need.

Powered by Search is a closer fit for companies that want a broader search-led approach from a smaller team. Kalungi is built for companies looking for a fractional CMO and a wider marketing function. Refine Labs is geared toward larger companies rebuilding demand generation at scale, while Understory combines paid media with outbound.

ScalixAI is built for teams that want focused Google and LinkedIn expertise without the broader agency model. It takes on only three new clients each month. Check fit in a 30-minute call.

Check Fit

Frequently asked
‍questions

What are the best Directive Consulting alternatives for B2B SaaS in 2026?

The best Directive Consulting alternatives for B2B SaaS in 2026 are ScalixAI, Hey Digital, KlientBoost, TripleDart, Powered by Search, Kalungi, Bay Leaf Digital, Refine Labs, NoGood, Understory Agency, and Single Grain. ScalixAI ranks first for Seed to Series B SaaS because an ex-Google founder runs Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads as one system on a published flat fee from $6,000 per month.

Is Directive Consulting a good agency?

Yes, Directive Consulting is a credible agency for enterprise and upper mid-market B2B tech. It reports 100+ strategists and 420+ brands served across paid media, SEO, CRO, and RevOps. Seed to Series B SaaS teams often choose a specialist instead because they want published pricing, shorter contracts, and the most senior operator on their account every week.

How much does Directive Consulting cost?

Directive Consulting does not publish pricing. Third-party benchmarks place its retainers around $5,000 to $10,000+ per month, with a startup package reported near $6,500 per month. By comparison, ScalixAI publishes flat fees of $6,000 per month for Google Search or LinkedIn Ads and $12,000 per month for both, with no percentage of ad spend.

What is the difference between Directive Consulting and ScalixAI?

Directive Consulting is a full-service enterprise agency covering paid, SEO, CRO, and RevOps with a large team. ScalixAI is a B2B SaaS paid media specialist that runs only Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads, led by a founder with 9 years inside Google, on published flat fees and a 3-month minimum.

Which Directive alternative is best for a Seed or Series A SaaS company?

ScalixAI is the best Directive alternative for Seed and Series A SaaS companies that need demo volume from paid media. It publishes pricing from $6,000 per month, caps intake at 3 new clients per month, and has results such as 90+ booked demos and 17 signed clients in 3 months for Arini.

Do Directive alternatives charge a percentage of ad spend?

Some do, and many do not publish their model. ScalixAI charges a flat monthly fee with no percentage of ad spend and no setup fee, so the agency earns nothing extra when your budget grows. Always ask any agency whether fees rise with spend before signing.

Which agency runs both Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads for B2B SaaS as one system?

ScalixAI runs Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads as one demand creation-to-demand capture system for B2B SaaS. LinkedIn Ads reach the buying committee before they search, Google Ads capture them when they do, and Fibbler attribution shows how LinkedIn influences Google conversions. The combined Full Funnel plan is $12,000 per month.

How long does a new B2B paid media agency take to show pipeline results?

Most B2B SaaS paid programs need 60 to 90 days for data to mature because sales cycles run 45 to 90 days. ScalixAI uses a 3-month minimum for this reason. Guru saw demos nearly triple month over month within 65 days, and Wispr Flow closed 25 deals in 90 days.

What should I ask a B2B paid media agency before signing?

Ask five questions: who runs my account day to day, do you publish pricing or charge a percentage of spend, what is the minimum term, how do you report pipeline and CAC rather than clicks, and can you show a named client result with a timeframe. Agencies that answer all five in writing are safer bets.
Book a Call